Private Messages |
| |
Inbox
- Log in to check your private messages. |
|
Site Stats |
Website Data Feed |
Last Updated 09/04/2010 8:02:28 AM |
Active Users |
Active Members: 2
Guests: 1
|
Visits since 2.7.2008 |
Unique Visitors: 559562
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted on 05/25/2010 at 12:17:29 PM
Viewed 251 times
With 8 replies
View other blogs by pcmartin
pcmartin has not created a member gallery yet!
|
Consider the following 8-ball statistical information:
Raised to SL 7 before best 10 of last 20 matches played.
SL7 based on best 10 of last 20.
Per L.O., 11-9 of last 20.
Record of 2-9 since 1/1/10. All area scores sent to St. Louis weekly from all operating areas played. Thus record prior to 1/1/10 would be
9-0.
------------------------------------
2-9 (1 of the wins, first night of session, Anderson 2010)
9-0 (As a SL-7 is a VERY incredible record, 10-0 albeit in 09/10 is even more incredible!!!)
___
11-9 = L. O. report
------------------------------------------
From 10-0 (before 1/8/10) per L.O.
to 1-9 (after 1/8/10) per player and combined league records.....
Is lowering this person to a SL6 a consideration?
YES or NO only please, just remember, the statistical information could similarly reflect your SL situation too.
|
|
|
|
|
wileydog
Senior Poster
 180 Posts
|
 Posted 05/25/2010 : 1:10:59 PM
(Edited 05/25/10 @ 26:59)
|
Yes
Sounds like St. Louis players suck compared to Indy players. |
 |
|
|
Mary Blythe
Senior Poster
280 Posts
|
Posted 05/25/2010 : 1:22:01 PM
|
No because I haven't gotten the call 
Actually I have no idea because I am having trouble following your information.
  Mary Blythe
|
|
|
|
mksharkster
Forum Regular
128 Posts
|
Posted 05/25/2010 : 1:36:11 PM
|
yeah i'm with mary, wtf?
The Sharkster!! |
|
|
|
pcmartin
Rookie..be nice to me
3 Posts
|
Posted 05/25/2010 : 2:13:55 PM
(Edited 05/25/10 @ 22:31)
|
| Recently (beginning of Fall Session 09) player raised to SL7...fast forward to end of fall session, player is playing in 2 different operating areas on different nights goes 10-0 just prior to 1/8/10 then goes 1-9 up to end of Spring Session (5/20/10). |
|
|
|
Mary Blythe
Senior Poster
280 Posts
|
Posted 05/25/2010 : 3:37:21 PM
|
Ok well that makes much more sense!
You are correct your handicap is based off your last 20 scores. It doesn't matter if you took off 2 years or not they are still on your "record". You have to remember that you play in a league where there is lots of sandbagging - not saying that you or your friend/ teammate are doing that just pointing out the facts - so people have been known to "quit playing" when they are raised then "start" again thinking that if they lose they will go right back down.
Also playing in 2 different areas you are going to be playing different caliber players. So your 7 may have been "it" where they played before whereas here he/she just seems average.
I have 2 players on my team right now that have lost almost 10 in a row too, but they still have "good scores" on there.
I know it is very frustrating, but just continue to play your game - or whoever you are talking about - and in the end it will all work itself out.
If nothing else works call me and I will just tell John to lower the person
Mary Blythe
|
|
|
|
mksharkster
Forum Regular
128 Posts
|
Posted 05/25/2010 : 5:39:50 PM
|
I agree with mary about different caliber players.
I was in louisville for a family thing a while back, and went out to a bar for a few games. Not only did I find myself playing on diamond tables, but the "average" bar player was equivalent to probably a six in our league, I had trouble keeping up. When I can walk into any bar here and drink for free against most "average" bar players...
There is definately something to be said for a home field.
The Sharkster!! |
|
|
|
Will
Frequent Contrbutor
50 Posts
|
Posted 05/25/2010 : 8:09:38 PM
(Edited 05/25/10 @ 10:14)
|
Of course you agree with Mary. She is always right. 
I have seen players who have transfered from other areas and their handicap change because they changed areas. Some have went up and others have went down. Just depends alot on who you are playing against. |
|
|
|
Calcutta Mafia
Doyen
328 Posts
|
Posted 05/27/2010 : 12:44:51 PM
|
everything is a consideration. Remember the L.O. has the final say so because he is the APA.
This person should be watched and red flagged. 11 of 20 is a perfect record. Meaning that he is going to have 10 win as a part of his calculated scores.....maybe. (If this sl 7 lost to another sl 7 on the hill in like 3 innings then this score would count as opposed to a winning score because this is a very good score when broken down)
The fact that all of a sudden he went like 1-9 probably tells me that he is throwing off but not necessarily, more investigation needed.
Doubtful that he would go down, needs more investigation.
"It is not what you have, but what you overcome" |
|
|
|
|
 New Topic
| Reply to Topic
|
|
|
|
